Do we need to deregulate the health insurance industry? - no physical term life insurance
Insurance is one of the most regulated industries in the world. Rather than implementing a universal health care system, we model the health insurance model in life, instead of today?
If the insurance industry to enable deregulation and competition between states would be affordable.
You can do all the health condition that increases in value to what you need, like all life. Now young to get the cheapest prices. In the long term health, which can be purchased in 1 years, up to 5 years, 10 or 20 years, takes life long term. The premiums are on the examination of your choice and physical.
1 years long-term health would be cheaper and would cover health care and basic cost to set each year we age. The total expenditure for health care would be expensive and if it does not use any policy if you die, whichever happens your children or spouse.
For me, it makes sense against the UHC. Thoughts?
Wednesday, January 20, 2010
No Physical Term Life Insurance Do We Need To Deregulate The Health Insurance Industry?
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
3 comments:
We must liberalize all markets. Government regulations are bad, period. This makes working abroad. No company, no jobs, unemployment, welfare, taxes are high. The market can not be manageable.
We do not need government protection, you can buy for ourselves and if something goes wrong, we can learn and grow.
You may remember the late 90's, blackouts and soaring energy prices that California experienced. That, my friend, was the result of deregulation. The blue-state "in the country were willing to follow the model of Cali. For bombed. Deregulating rarely works. However, it is possible and convenient for the university hospital.
U & yes we do need to run for office because u got my vote
Post a Comment